Sunday, October 29, 2006

Report from Hot Springs Doc Festival

On Friday, I spent the day at the Hot Springs Documentary Film Festival, one of the world's premiere showcases for documentary films. The festival runs for 10 days, and I only spent one, but I still saw a number of good films as well as one of the best docs I have ever seen.

The first film I saw was a short doc called The ACLU Freedom Files: Dissent. The film showcased a number of shocking betrayals of the right to free speech. In particular, the film highlights instances of protesters at Bush/Cheney events being arrested for not protesting in the proper "zone" or even protesting at all. It's disappointing these things are happening more frequently and not getting wide press coverage. Unfortunately, the film looked terrible, suffering from some technical issues.

The 2nd film, 1o Questions for the Dalai Lama, traces filmmaker Rick Ray's journey through India to come up with 10 questions to ask the Dalia Lama during a one hour interview. The film is a little long, but very effective in telling the 20th century history of Tibet and the Dalai Lama. His questions are varied, though not especially philosophical. The Dalai Lama's answers tend to be broad and at times almost cliche, yet he seems to realize this and often laughs at his own answers. Any fan of Buddhism, Tibet, or the Dalai Lama should check this out.

The next film, Kind, True, and Necessary was an overly long look at a Quaker couple living in Oregon. The entire film is VO of the couple discussing their life (interesting at times) over shots of them doing their thing at home over a couple of days period.

The fourth film I watched, So Goes the Nation, is highly polished film that examines the 2004 presidential election through the lens of Ohio. The film features a wide range of interviews with grass roots workers, top level campaign officials from each side, and political commentators such Paul Begala discussing the election. The film is sympathetic to the Democrats in my view, but it does a nice job rationally and objectively examining the strategy that the Republicans used to propel Bush over John Kerry.

The fifth documentary was one of the best documentaries I have ever seen. Titled Can Mr. Smith Get to Washington Anymore, the film traces political newcomer Jeff Smith's campaign for the U.S. House of Representatives in St. Louis. Smith ran against political insider Russ Carnahan, whose father Mel was a Missouri governor, and mother Jean was a US Senator (Taking Mel Carnahan's seat when he died before taking office). He also ran against 8 other candidates in the Democratic primary. All were after Dick Gephardt's vacant seat. Jeff gathers a staff of mostly political novices with one or two more experienced staffers. Mostly he runs on pure energy, excitement, straight talk, and intelligence. In the end Smith lost to Carnahan by about 1500 votes, which was truly extraordinary. Despite Smith's loss, he reinvigorates your faith in the ideals of Democracy and the belief that if you want to make a difference you can run for office. When the movie ended, the audience gave an ovation that lasted nearly as long as the credits. When the lights came up, Jeff Smith was introduced, along with director, Frank Popper, and he received a standing ovation nearly as long as the movie got. If you get the chance to see this film, do it. It's inspiring and extraordinary.

The last film of the night was American Stag, directed by my friend Ben Meade, a filmmaker and professor at Avila College in Overland Park, Kansas. Ben's film takes both a serious and humorous look at American stag films from the 20s to the 60s. It features interviews with minor celebrities like Adam Corolla and Tommy Chong, as well as film historians. The film is well constructed, but of course, the highlight is the stag films themselves, and perhaps a dozen or more are featured and we see a good chunk of many of them. Some are sad, some funny, some disturbing. But you get sucked in, and of course, with any movie of this sort, you end up in the same position as the men who used to gather at parties and lodges to watch these films. Of course, if you know Ben, you know he likes to manipulate and play with his audience, and though American Stag may be the most straightforward of all his films, he continues to play with viewers in this film as well. It's funny and entertaining and very well made. Look for it and check it out.

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari - Movies - Review - New York Times

The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari - Movies - Review - New York Times

For a while now I've been hearing about this new version of Caligari in which the original backgrounds were scanned and new actors, with dialgoue, told the story anew. Well, rumors no more. It is opening in Manhattan.

Sunday, October 22, 2006

David Poland's Response to The New Yorker Article

The Hot Button: October 18, 2006

I was going to post more on why I wasn't too impressed with the guys featured in Gladwell's article on predicting hit movies. But David Poland, The Hot Button blog, covers all the bases pretty well, so I direct you to his site. He pretty much calls BS on the whole thing...

What if you built a machine to predict hit movies?

The Formula: What if you built a machine to predict hit movies?

Very, very interesting article by Malcolm Gladwell about guys predicting hit movies. My initial reaction, on reading the quotes from the guys, is that there's no way their program can predict hits the way the article claims it does.

Also, they start sounding really ridiculous when offering how to make movies better. Of course, their program has never been tested (and can never be tested) in recommending how a released movie could be improved to make more money.

Having said all that, I'm really curious to learn more about these guys.

The article is long, but well worth the read.

Monday, October 16, 2006

Some thoughts on Youtube and Google - Blog Maverick

Some thoughts on Youtube and Google - Blog Maverick

There has been a lot of discussion about Google's acquistion of YouTube. Anyway interested in filmmaking and the web should be following the ins and outs of this discussion. Mark Cuban, as always, has an opinionated and incisive take on the issue. This is the link to the first article he wrote on the subject, but he has about 3 or 4 more recent entries. It's worth looking at.

Monday, October 09, 2006

ZoomLicense: Finally a way for indies to license pop music? - DV Guru

ZoomLicense: Finally a way for indies to license pop music? - DV Guru

Interesting possibilities with this Zoom site. There's no mention of festival rights, and I'm guessing internet rights, like broadcast rights aren't covered. Still, this site might be worth checking out when it comes online.

Google to Acquire YouTube for $1.65 Billion - New York Times

Google to Acquire YouTube for $1.65 Billion - New York Times

Google takes a risk by acquiring YouTube. It will be interesting to see how YouTube changes as a result of Google's influence and whether Google can help solve the sticky copyright issues that YouTube faces when users upload copyrighted material.

Variety.com - Lucas tilts at studio tentpoles

Variety.com - Lucas tilts at studio tentpoles

When the man who made his fortune on big budget blockbusters, says that the tentpole movie is no longer worth making, he might be worth listening to.

Lucas donated $175 million to the USC film school, but says his main choice these days is a larger quantity of smaller scale projects.

Wednesday, October 04, 2006

Next in Top Ten

Okay, we've reached the letter "H." H is for:

Heaven, 2002, Written by Krzysztof Kieslowkski and Krzysztof Piesiewicz ; Directed by Tom Tykwer.

First of all, I have to say that the plot synopsis I link to at The All Movie Guide is not particularly descriptive of the movie in my opinion, and the review is negative and pretty wrong-headed. I will certainly agree that reviews of Heaven were generally mixed when it came out and that the movie is perhaps flawed in some ways. Having said that, Heaven is the most beautiful film I have ever seen from a sensory point of view. The score (and at times silence) is simple but gorgeous and the cinematography and lighting are immense in every way.

Criticism generally comes in discussing the story, but I think the story is more complex than many give it credit for. Basically, Philippa (Cate Blanchett) bombs a building hoping to kill the drug dealer that she believe is responsible for her husband's death; instead she kills four innocent people. The first half of the film centers around her interrogation by the Italian police. During the interrogation, her translator Filippo (Giovanni Ribisi) falls in love with her. He helps her escape, and the 2nd half of the movie follows their flight.

A couple of things stand out. Some of the reviews I've read assume Philippa loves Filippo (she tells his father this). But in a superbly acted scene, it seems clear to me that Philippa's feelings are not so straight-forward. Does she love Filippo in a certain way? Yes, but not in the way he loves her. The merging of the characters (Philippa/Filippo) into one is fascinating--they shave their heads, dress the same, and become sort of androgynous twins. When they finally make love in silhoutte it's almost impossible to tell them apart. Finally, the ending, to me, is mind-blowing. Many attempts at symbol or metaphor are either too obscure to be worthwhile or too obvious to be meaningful. But Heaven's ending is simple in execution and the metaphor is clear, yet the actual facts of the ending are far from clear.